Cookies

We use cookies to understand how the website is being used and to ensure you get the best possible experience.
By continuing to use this site, you consent to this policy. About cookies

Social Explorer Project Named a Webby Award Nominee: Vote for the People’s Voice Award!

TUESDAY, APR 05, 2016

Help Us Win the People's Voice Webby Award

Social Explorer's interactive map project The Threat to Representation for Children and Non-Citizens has been nominated for best legal website in the 20th Annual Webby Awards. Our site and companion report illustrate the potential impact that the Evenwel v. Abbott Supreme Court case could have had on representation around the nation (and still might depending on further legal challenges).

vote_for_usThe Webby Awards is the Internet’s most respected symbol of success. The 20th Annual Webby Awards received almost 13,000 entries from nearly all 50 states and 65 countries worldwide. Out of the thousands of sites, videos, apps, and ads that were submitted, only a handful of Nominees were chosen by the Academy and we are honored to be among them. Webby Winners are selected by The International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences, a global organization of industry experts and technology innovators. Plus, we're in the running for the public vote and would love your support.

Help us win the People’s Voice Award!  Please go here to vote: https://pv.webbyawards.com/2016/websites/general-website/law

Voting is open from today April 5th to Thursday, April 21st at 11:59 PM/PST. Please note that there is a simple registration to vote on the Webby Award site, and then be sure to confirm your account, so please check your promotions and spam folders to make sure your vote is counted. (More on how to vote here.)

We are also proud to be in the company of our fellow law website nominees the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Institute for Justice (founded by the Koch brothers), Citizenshipworks, and the Law Innovation Laboratory at Northeastern University. Winners will be announced on April 26th.

More About the Project The Threat to Representation for Children and Non-Citizens

A legal challenge nearly altered how people are counted and how districts are drawn. On April 4th, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Evenwel v. Abbott, whose plaintiffs argued that legislative districts should be based upon the number of voters or potential voters in each district instead of all residents. In a unanimous verdict, the Court found that states did not have to consider eligible voter numbers when redistricting, and thus upheld the population equality standard.

But, the opinion leaves the door open for future legal challenges if and when a state employs an alternative method for redistricting, such as counting eligible voters (citizens 18 years and older). When this case first went to trial, Professor Andrew Beveridge analyzed the effects of such a change in the report The Threat to Representation for Children and Non-Citizens: An Analysis of the Potential Impact of Evenwel v. Abbott on Redistricting, which is available for download (pdf).

The award winning data visualization website Social Explorer (Beveridge is the co-founder and president) also developed a companion interactive tool (available at https://www.socialexplorer.com/evenwel) to visualize how state legislative and congressional districts would need to change and which groups would be affected. Explore the maps to see the impact nationwide and zoom in for a close up on your local community.  

evenwel_12_01_screenshot 

If the Court had ruled for the plaintiffs virtually all legislative districting plans in the United States would need to be redrawn, and children and non-citizens would no longer count towards representation.

Using the data that would have been available in 2011 to draw districts, Beveridge estimated the effect on every State Legislative and Congressional District in the United States (the 2010 Census and 2006-10 American Community Survey, from which the U.S. Census Bureau tabulates Citizens of Voting Age Population for various ethnic and racial communities at the block group level). These data are also available for download through the interactive tool.

Adhering to the widely-used standards for the division of districts (that state legislative districts should be within five percent of the average district size and congressional districts must be equal), the following results were found:

  • Nearly half of upper house legislative districts would no longer be of legal size compared to the new eligible-voter based average district size (49.9 percent of districts, or 974 of 1951).
  • Over half of the lower house legislative districts would also need to be redrawn (57.2 percent of districts, or 2,739 of 4,792).
  • More than two thirds of congressional districts would be beyond two percent of the eligible-voter based average district size (69.7 percent of districts).
  • There would be a substantial power shift away from areas with school age children, Hispanics, Asians and non-Citizens towards areas with older residents, who were more likely citizens and non-Hispanic white.
  • The equivalent of almost five congressional seats (4.89) would switch from Democratic to Republican control.
  • There might be even more impact in terms of the concerns of each party as fewer Hispanics and parents with children would have a voice, while the influence of the childless and non-Hispanic communities would grow in power (especially in Texas, New York City, and California).

Andrew A. Beveridge, Ph.D., is Professor of Sociology at Queens College and the Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York.  Since 1993, Dr. Beveridge has been a consultant to the New York Times, which has published numerous news reports and maps based upon his analysis of census data. A volume he edited with David Halle of UCLA titled New York and Los Angeles: The Uncertain Future was published in 2013 by Oxford University Press.  He received his Ph.D. and M.Phil. in sociology from Yale University and his B.A with honors in economics from Yale College. Before coming to CUNY he taught for eight years at Columbia University.  He has received grant and fellowship support from the American Council of Learned Societies, the National Science Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and many other agencies.  He has also been involved with numerous consulting engagements including many related to Civil Rights litigation.  He was awarded the Public Understanding of Sociology Award by the American Sociological Association in 2007.  He is the president and co-founder of Social Explorer.

The views expressed in this report are Beveridge’s alone and do not necessarily represent the views of any organization with which he is associated.

Social Explorer is an online research tool designed to provide quick and easy access to current and historical demographic data.  Social Explorer was first conceived of in 1999 to break down the barriers to demographic visualization and large-scale data analysis. With support from the National Science Foundation and The New York Times, the Social Explorer team developed a sophisticated data system and a simple online interface to give users access to comprehensive demographic data and interactive tools. The site first launched to the public in 2003 and became available by subscription in 2007 through our distributor Oxford University Press, as well as through partnerships with Pearson Publishers and the Census Bureau.

Honors include a 2015 Webby Award Honoree for Best Government Website (Census Explorer: Young Adults Then and Now), 2014 Webby Award Honoree for Best Education Website, the Gold Medal in the 2015 Modern Library Awards, the 2010 Outstanding Reference Source Award from the Reference and User Services Association (a division of the American Library Association), and the 2012 Standard of Excellence Award from the Web Marketing Association.

Data insights are waiting to be uncovered
Get Started

Already using Social Explorer? Log in.