MONDAY, APR 16, 2012

Social Explorer in the NY Times with the Data Behind the Debate over Stay-at-Home Mothers

In the New York Times article "For Most, Choice of Stay-at-Home Motherhood Is Far From a Luxury." Susan Saulny examines the realities of balancing motherhood and career in today's economy and work world.  With a debate over Democratic strategist Hilary Rosen's comment on Ann Romney's choice to not work swirling in the news, Saulny discusses the actual demographic profile of stay-at-home mothers.  She cites census data and analysis from Social Explorer's Andrew Beveridge: Stay-at-home mothers are younger, less educated and more likely to be Hispanic than they were in previous generations, and perhaps have a more traditional view of family and more limited job skills than other women these days, according to a Census Bureau report that analyzed changes in stay-at-home motherhood from 1969 to 2009. Eighteen percent of stay-at-home mothers lack a high school degree, compared with 7 percent of women in the work force. And black women were about half as likely as white women to be stay-at-home mothers. Across the country, 70 percent of married women over the age of 25 with children work outside the home. The median income of those households is about $87,700, compared with $64,000 for households where the mother stays at home, according to an analysis by Andrew A. Beveridge, a sociologist at Queens College of the City University of New York. “The biggest difference is education,” he said. Click here to read the full article.
by Sydney Beveridge
Back to all posts